Rational choice and AGM belief revision
نویسنده
چکیده
Article history: Received 24 October 2008 Received in revised form 8 May 2009 Accepted 11 May 2009 Available online 30 May 2009
منابع مشابه
Semantic structures for one-stage and iterated belief revision
Semantic structures for belief revision are proposed. We start with one-stage revision structures that generalize the notion of choice function from rational choice theory. A correspondence between these one-stage structures and AGM belief revision functions is established. We then add branching time and consider more general structures that accommodate iterated revision. AGM temporal revision ...
متن کاملRevealed preference, iterated belief revision and dynamic games
In previous work (G. Bonanno, Rational choice and AGM belief revision, Artificial Intelligence, 2009) a semantics for AGM belief revision was proposed based on choice frames, borrowed from the rational choice literature. In this paper we discuss how to use choice frames to analyze extensive-form games. Given an extensive form with perfect recall, a choice frame can be used to represent a player...
متن کاملBelief revision in a temporal framework
We study a branching-time temporal logic of belief revision where the interaction of belief and information is modeled explicitly. The logic is based on three modal operators: a belief operator, an information operator and a next-time operator. We consider three logics of increasing strength. The rst captures the most basic notion of minimal belief revision. The second characterizes the qualit...
متن کاملIterated Belief Revision: A Computational Approach
The capability of revising its beliefs upon new information in a rational and efficient way is crucial for an intelligent agent. The classic AGM theory studies mathematically idealized models of belief revision in two aspects: the properties (i.e., the AGM postulates) a rational revision operator should satisfy; and how to construct concrete revision operators. In scenarios where new informatio...
متن کاملBelief Revision and Rational Inference
The (extended) AGM postulates for belief revision seem to deal with the revision of a given theory K by an arbitrary formula φ, but not to constrain the revisions of two different theories by the same formula. A new postulate is proposed and compared with other similar postulates that have been proposed in the literature. The AGM revisions that satisfy this new postulate stand in one-to-one cor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 173 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009